The Importance of Historical Accuracy in the Philippines: Why We Cannot Afford to Forget the Past

Read Time:2 Minute, 58 Second

The Philippines, like many other nations, has a complex and often painful history. It has endured colonization, dictatorship, martial law, and social injustice, among other challenges. In recent years, a troubling trend has emerged: historical revisionism. This refers to the distortion, manipulation, or outright denial of historical facts, often for political or ideological reasons. In this article, we will explore the dangers of historical revisionism and why it is crucial to uphold the truth in the Philippines.

One of the main dangers of historical revisionism is that it erodes the collective memory and identity of a nation. By distorting or denying past events, revisionists create a false narrative that can lead to confusion, division, and even conflict. They may whitewash the crimes of past regimes or glorify certain figures or events that caused harm. This can create a distorted sense of pride or shame, and prevent people from learning from the mistakes of the past.

For example, some revisionists in the Philippines have attempted to downplay or justify the atrocities committed during the martial law era, which lasted from 1972 to 1986 under the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos. They argue that Marcos was a visionary leader who brought prosperity to the country and that the human rights abuses and corruption associated with his regime were exaggerated or necessary for national security. This narrative ignores the widespread suffering, displacement, and trauma inflicted on countless Filipinos during that dark period and undermines the struggle for justice and accountability.

Another danger of historical revisionism is that it can perpetuate harmful myths and stereotypes, particularly against marginalized groups. Revisionists may erase or distort the contributions of indigenous peoples, women, LGBT+ people, and other minorities, and promote a homogenous or exclusionary version of national identity. This can lead to discrimination, intolerance, and violence against those who do not fit the dominant narrative.

For instance, some revisionists in the Philippines have attempted to deny or downplay the existence of pre-colonial civilizations and cultures, and portray indigenous peoples as primitive or inferior. This erases the rich diversity and complexity of Filipino history and culture and perpetuates the legacy of colonialism and imperialism. It also ignores the ongoing struggles of indigenous peoples for recognition, self-determination, and human rights.

A third danger of historical revisionism is that it can undermine democracy and the rule of law. Revisionists may manipulate or fabricate evidence to justify their agenda and attack the credibility of independent media, academics, and institutions that uphold the truth. This can erode public trust in the democratic process, and lead to the spread of misinformation and propaganda.

For example, some revisionists in the Philippines have spread conspiracy theories and fake news about the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines, and the government’s response. They have also attacked journalists and activists who have exposed human rights abuses, corruption, and other forms of wrongdoing. This undermines the accountability and transparency that are essential for a functioning democracy and creates a climate of fear and impunity.

In conclusion, historical revisionism poses a grave threat to the Philippines and other nations. It distorts the past, erodes identity, perpetuates discrimination, and undermines democracy. We must therefore uphold the truth and resist revisionist narratives, no matter how tempting or convenient they may seem. We must listen to diverse voices, seek multiple sources of information, and challenge our own biases and assumptions. By doing so, we can honor the memory of those who have suffered and sacrificed for the sake of freedom, justice, and human dignity. ##